President Trump hasn’t merely demanded personal, identifying information (PII) on all voters in all 50 states.
His Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity also asked that it be sent to a non-secure website, making the data vulnerable to identity theft and financial fraud, according to the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC).
On Wednesday, EPIC filed an emergency restraining order to block the commission from trying to get voter data, calling the data demand a violation of the Constitutional right to privacy.
As of Wednesday, 44 states and the District of Columbia had refused to hand over all the requested information.
Mississippi Secretary of State Delbert Hosemann suggested an alternative action for the commission:
They can go jump in the Gulf of Mexico and Mississippi is a great state to launch from.
On Sunday, Trump tweeted a suggestion that the recalcitrant states and DC are trying to hide something:
Numerous states are refusing to give information to the very distinguished VOTER FRAUD PANEL. What are they trying to hide?
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 1, 2017
On June 28, the commission had sent a letter (PDF) to states seeking voter PII in order to “analyze vulnerabilities and issues related to voter registration and voting”.
What data are the states “trying to hide”? … or, rather, what data are some states eager to hand over, others are flat-out refusing to hand over, and some states are cherrypicking according to a disinclination to share sensitive information such as taxpayer IDs or other PII?
According to the letter sent to states, the commission is after:
…full first and last names of all registrants, middle names or initials if available, addresses, dates of birth, political party (if recorded in your state), last four digits of social security number if available, voter history (elections voted in) from 2006 onward, active/inactive status, cancelled status, information regarding any felony convictions, information regarding voter registration in another state, information regarding military status, and overseas citizen information.
In May, Trump signed an executive order to create the commission. One of its mandates is to create a report on voter fraud:
The Commission shall … submit a report to the President that identifies … (c) those vulnerabilities in voting systems and practices used for Federal elections that could lead to improper voter registrations and improper voting, including fraudulent voter registrations and fraudulent voting.
Since the 2016 election, Trump has been claiming massive voter fraud and providing zero evidence.
In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 27, 2016
The commission has requested publicly available voter roll data, in accordance with the laws of each state. EPIC said in its lawsuit that the request for information such as financial data and, in particular, the home addresses of military members and their families – along with its plans to make the information “publicly available” – is “without precedent and crazy”.
From the commission’s letter:
Please be aware that any documents that are submitted to the full Commission will also be made available to the public.
In its emergency restraining order, EPIC also cites the commission’s failure to undertake a required Privacy Impact Assessment prior to sending requests to state election officials, saying that the omission underscores an “urgent need for relief”. (This isn’t the first time that the government has skipped over a required Privacy Impact Assessment: in March, lawmakers raked the FBI over the coals for failing to do a privacy assessment on the facial recognition technology behind its enormous database of tens of millions of face images.)
The commission’s letter directs states to submit the information by July 14 to ElectionIntegrityStaff@ovp.eop.gov or by what it says is a secure FTP site for transferring large data files, Safe Access File Exchange (“SAFE”), at http://bit.ly/2tUFI1s.
A “secure,” HTTPS site? … which EPIC is claiming to be not secure, as does my browser?
…a site that, one assumes, is supposed to be secure in order to protect data from interception?
… data that the commission intends to make publicly available anyway?
Besides the Gulf of Mexico, there are many other bodies of water adjacent to, or within, US states that the commission might consider jumping into, as implied by many states’ responses. CNN has compiled those responses here.